|
The government has named Gyeongju in North Gyeongsang Province as the site
of a low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste repository after 19 years
of decision-making and nine failed attempts to select a nuclear dump site
amid strong local opposition.
The Gyeongju nuclear waste repository is a significant success story as it
stands as the first state project determined in a plebiscite. The city
recorded a high turnout of 70.8 percent and a support rating of no less than
89.5 percent after the government incentivized its offer and local
campaigning won over reluctant locals.
Though defeated by Gyeongju, both Gunsan and Yeongdeok posted turnouts in
the 70 percent to 80 percent range and support rates of around 80 percent.
This occurred despite fierce opposition from residents of candidate sites in
previous years.
Conflict arising from the controversial plan to introduce a radioactive
waste dump into their backyard even spilled over into violence in Buan,
North Jeolla Province, two years ago.
A number of factors contributed to the surging interest in accepting the
repository. Following the Buan debacle, the government overcame residents'
safety concerns by eliminating high-level radioactive waste from the
proposed dump site. It also promised support for the regional economy in the
form of a state subsidy of W300 billion (about US$300 million), vowed to relocate
the headquarters of the state-run Korea Hydro & Nuclear Co. and build a
multi-billion won sub-atomic particular accelerator in the area. These
pledges were legally guaranteed.
In addition, the government introduced a plebiscite to hand the residents
the decision-making power on whether they wanted to host a nuclear waste
repository.
The government now has to make good on its promise by proving it can deliver
the Gyeongju nuclear waste repository without any hitches and in an
exemplary manner. Transparent and efficient management is needed not only in
the construction process but also in the operational stage.
The administration may look abroad for positive examples. Foreign nuclear
waste repositories such as Roka Shomura in Japan are already being used as
recreational and tourism facilities for local citizens as well as venues for
further scientific study. We must see to it that the Gyeongju site meets
world safety standards and is enjoyed and endeared by the people
who have to live with it.
It is important for those residents and environmental organizations that
opposed the inducement of nuclear waste dumps to accept the outcome of
ballots and join forces so that construction on the waste repository
proceeds smoothly. Instead of putting more obstacles in the way of the epic project, let them contribute to enhancing the nuclear waste dump¡¯s safety.
|