An election is a matter of choice, and this is made based on differences. Unlike previous elections where multiple candidates divided votes, the 16th presidential election is more polarized with two very distinct, and almost equally popular, candidates.

The polarization will indeed make the voters' decision easier by clearly distinguishing one from another, but its inevitable tradeoff is the split of our society into two extremes. Differences in senses of values and tendencies among groups with different ideologies, generations, regions and classes went beyond the range of various demographics and solidified segregation from one another. Constructive political talks and discussions within families and work often go nowhere.

Both candidates' campaigns focus on attacking the rival by picking on weaknesses and scandals, instead of offering better alternatives and viable visions, widening the gap between supporters.

The moment of truth has arrived and the decision will be made tomorrow. Ideological division, personal attacks, and consequent national division must end with the election, and voters should accept the result and reunite as Koreans. An election could only act as an integrating agent of people's thinking, when the electorate gives it authority by exercising precious suffrage. An election's true meaning of uniting the people's will can only fade if they become politically indifferent.

There are more floating votes in this election than any previous ones, as many dislikes falling into any of the extremes, meaning a possible low turnout. However, each vote counts toward the outcome, and giving up suffrage would only deepen social divisions. The elected president will head the nation for the next five years, and it's a citizen's duty to vote for whom them support, or whoever is the best of the lot.

December 18, 2002